OLLIN VASTAUKSIA KESKUSTELUSSA, MISSÄ "RÄTTIPÄIDEN YSTÄVÄ" VAATII ISRAELIN SUURLÄHETTILÄSTÄ GO HOME Jasser Arafat Olli 29.08.2001 klo 10.48 Olet ilmeisesti sen verran nuori ettet tiedä kuinka monen veri on vuotanut PLO:n johtajan käden kautta. 70-luvun pahimpia terroristeja maailmassa, palkittiin 90-luvulla veritöistään rauhannobelilla! On siinä meriittiä neuvottelijalla! Ja varmasti hän nytkin ajaa rauhan asiaa, ainakin sinä tunnut niin uskovan? Ajatuksesi antaa kuvan ettei juutalainen ole ihminen lainkaan vai unohditko Tel Avivin pommi- iskun jossa kymmenittäin nuoria siviilejä kuoli? Tai Jerusalemin pizzeria iskun jonka seurauksena 15 kuoli ja 130 loukkaantui? Lue seuraava niin ymmärrät mistä on kyse nyt Lähi- Idässä: The Islamic concept of ‘Dhimmihood’ in Koranic Law and the practices of Islam look down with extreme prejudice on all other religions. They consider the Jews and Christians ‘People of the Book’ but treat them as inferiors when Muslims are in ruling majority. The Jews who received the word of G-d first are their main targets. But, many Islamic Laws treated the Jews and Christians as lowly people: in Arabic ‘Dhimmis’ and subjected to persecution. Jews received worse treatment than the Christians because Christians had protection from the European countries. Among these Islamic laws included: 1. If the father of boy under 13 was killed, he could be freely taken and raised as a Muslim. 2. Jews (and Christians) must never be higher than a Muslim, therefore, if passing a Muslim on the sidewalk, the Jew (and Christian) must pass on the left and must step into the street (usually the sewer); synagogues and churches had to be built lower than mosques; Jews (and Christians) could not ride a camel or horse, etc. 3. Jews (and Christians) could not testify in court against a Muslim - leading to countless human rights abuses, including a Muslim’s right to kill a Jew (or Christian), to steal his property, assault him, etc. - with impunity; 4. Jews (and Christians) were forced to live in ghettos. 5. A Muslim had the right ‘from time immemorial’ to enter Jewish houses and take toll or ‘contributions’ at any time without giving account. 6. According to the British Consulate report in 1839, the Jew’s life was not "much above" that of a dog. 7. ! A Jew had to wear a distinctive color on his clothing. 8. The Palestinian Mandate, designated as the Homeland for the Jews by the Balfour Declaration, ratified by the League of Nations and the American Congress was totally ignored as it was considered contrary to Islamic law and destiny. There were vicious pogroms by Muslim against Jews who were brutally attacked by Muslims...their homes sacked and their women violated. 8 Jew were not allowed to carry weapons of self-defense - even a knife - and, therefore, had to pay a poll tax - "jiza" to the governing Muslim authority for his protection. When he paid, his face was slapped to emphasize his lowly status. 9. There are, of course, many more racist laws of the Koran - all of which are intended to be re-implemented according to the Mullahs of Islam. Tässä alkua sinulle! Sbarro Pizzeria Olli 29.08.2001 klo 10.53 Madness Strikes in a Jerusalem Pizzeria A luncheon crowd is targeted by agents of death and destruction Dateline: August 12, 2001 On Thursday afternoon a large lunchtime crowd filled the Sbarro pizza restaurant in the center of Jerusalem. Businessmen and tourists, families with children, all crowded into Sbarro for pizza and pasta. Shortly after 2 p.m. an uninvited guest showed up at the restaurant and detonated an explosive device he was carrying. A huge explosion ripped through the restaurant, shattering glass, blowing up ovens, igniting fires. Fifteen people were killed in the suicide bombing attack, including five members of one family. Nearly 130 people were injured, some quite seriously. Infants were killed and maimed. Lives were shattered. And then the screaming began. An awful, heartrending sound; the sound of people coming to terms with a whole new reality, of people not wanting to comprehend that life has changed forever. From a letter written by Binny Freedman of Efrat, eyewitness I tried to understand what kind of person would unleash such a hideous attack on innocent civilians. I asked a Palestinian writer, with whom I have maintained an ongoing, though difficult correspondence, what was his opinion of the suicide bombing. My correspondent answered that he never "condoned the killing of civilians, most of all children." But the writer added that though the suicide was "an act of madness," this was what happens as a result of the Israeli occupation of Palestinians. More so, he wrote that Israel was responsible for the killing of many more innocent Palestinian civilians, including a large percentage of Palestinian children. He was equating the killing of Palestinian men, women and children with the killing of the Israelis in the Sbarro pizzeria. I answered him, saying that the killing of innocent civilians was absolutely wrong and horrifically tragic on both sides. Though we were talking about two "wrongs," in my opinion, there was a huge difference. The fifteen people - men, women and children - killed in the Jerusalem restaurant, were actually the targets. The person, whoever he is, wherever is he, who sent that suicide bomber on his mission, told him to kill as many innocent people as possible. My daughter ate in that very same Sbarro restaurant one week before the suicide bombing. I have eaten there on a number of occasions. In short, my family and I were the targets of the suicide bomber, but thanks to a twist of fate, our lives were saved when others perished. What did this suicide bomber want to achieve? To strike enough fear into the hearts of Israelis that our political leaders would begrudgedly make political concessions? Or to force us to pack our bags and flee for our lives? Living in Israel one must come to terms with the painful price of being surrounded by enemies who work relentlessly and shamelessly for our destruction. It is not easy, but we somehow find the courage to go ahead, and face another day. We will not give in to terror and we will not back down. We will continue to live, to eat pizza in the heart of Jerusalem and to build the State of Israel. We are not leaving. We will be here to celebrate this Shabbat and next Shabbat, and forever, until the end of time, here, in the hills of Judea and Gush Etzion, and Jerusalem. From a letter written by Binny Freedman of Efrat, eyewitness Olli 30.08.2001 klo 11.20 Ariel Sharon kutsuttiin Temppelivuorelle palestiinalaisten toimesta tutustumaan alueella olevaan rakennustyömaahan. Tämä on vain jäänyt Suomen tiedotusvälineiltä ilmoittamatta ja herää kysymys, miksi? Propaganda sota on kovaa. Palestiinalaiset kirjaavat Israelin sotilaiden ampumiksi myös sellaisia ihmisiä jotka ovat kuolleet luonnollisen kuoleman sairaalassa. Eräs ulkolainen toimittaja kertoili havainneensa myös sitä että palestiinalaiset ilmoittavat Israelin sotilaiden vallaneen jonkin alueen kovien taistelujen jälkeen ja paikalla käytyään on huomannut ettei mitään taistelua ollutkaan. On siis vaikea löytää totuus kokonaisuudesta. Pakko kommentoida Olli 30.08.2001 klo 11.15 Usein näyttää sille että täällä Suomessa ajatellaan palestiinalaisia nuoria viattomina kivenheittelijöinä joita Israelin sotilaat sitten ampuu. No, ensinkin täytyy miettiä sitä onko kivenheittely viatonta. Ruotsissa tapahtuneessa mielenosoituksessa taannoin nuoret käyttivät kiviä aseenaan poliisia vastaan ja särkivät niillä liikkeiden ikkunoita. Lehdistö heräsi tuomitsemaan kivenheittelyn sen vaarallisuuden vuoksi. Voihan päähän osunut kivi aiheuttaa vakavan vamman. Israel on aloittanut nyt täsmäiskut joilla se pyrkii tukahduttamaan intifadaa. Kohteena eivät olisi niinkään siviilikohteissa olevat sotilaat vaan suoraan vastuussa olevat johtajat. Maailma on tuominnut iskut mutta kuinka Suomi toimisi vastaavassa tilanteessa? Armeijan tehtävänä on suojella kansalaisia ensisijaisesti peloitteen mielikuvan avulla, toissijaisesti vasta käyttäen peloitetta. Israel on pakotettu käyttämään voimakeinoja lopettaakseen itsemurhaiskut. Vai väittääkö joku että Suomessa vastaavat teot jätettäisiin huomioimatta ilman vastatoimia? On kyse itsenäisen valtion oikeudesta olemassaoloon Tel Avivissa David Ben-Gurionin toukokuun 14. 1948 julistuksen mukaisesti jonka heti Yhdysvaltojen presidentti Truman hyväksyi. Pari tuntia myöhemmin Israelin itsenäisyys- julistuksen tunnusti myös silloinen Neuvostoliittokin. Kyse on myös siitä että Suomen valtio on tunnustanut Israelin itsenäisyyden. Tuomitsemalla nyt Israelin, Suomi osoittaa kykyä unohtaa oman historiansa. Olimme vastaavassa tilanteessa itsekin aiemmin kun Mainilan laukauksista saatiin syy ryhtyä vihamieliseen kostoiskuun kotimaatamme kohtaan. Palestiinan kansannousu on arabimaailmasta mobilisoitu ja rahoitettu ja se tähtää siihen että Israel saadaan kokonaan tuhottua.